Tax Savings Tips
IRS Rules for Deducting Your
Business Gym
If you
have been thinking about the fitness of your employees and the possibility of a
gym or other athletic facility, then you need to know the tax rules. To be tax
deductible, your gym or other athletic facility must be primarily for the
benefit of your employees—other than employees who are officers, shareholders,
or other owners who own a 10 percent or greater interest in the business, or
other highly compensated employees.
For the
10 percent ownership test, the law treats an employee as owning any interest
owned by a member of his or her family. Family includes brothers and sisters,
spouses, ancestors (such as parents and grandparents), and lineal descendants
(such as children and grandchildren).
The
highly compensated group consists of employees who earned more than $120,000
for the preceding year. The gym or other athletic facility must benefit the
rank-and-file employee group more than the owner and the highly compensated
group. Think of this primary-benefit test as a 51-49 test.
This
means that the rank-and-file employee group must use the facility on more days
than the owner and highly compensated group does. To see if you pass the 51-49
test, look only at days of use of the facility.
Example. Rank-and-file employees use the
gym 235 days during the year and you, the business owner, use it 137 days. The
gym passes the 51-49 test; accordingly, it’s deductible as an employee
recreational facility.
Tax Planning for Snowbirds
You can
plan your tax-deductible business life to avoid cold winters and hot summers.
Spend a moment examining the following four short paragraphs that contain the
basic facts from the Andrews case.
For six
months of the year, from May through October, Edward Andrews lived in
Lynnfield, Massachusetts, where he owned and operated Andrews Gunite Co., Inc.,
a successful pool construction business. During the other six months, Mr.
Andrews lived in Lighthouse Point, Florida, where he owned and operated a sole proprietorship
engaged in successful horse racing and breeding operations. In addition, he,
his brother, and his son owned a successful Florida-based pool construction
corporation from which Mr. Andrews took no salary, but where he did assist with
operations.
Instead
of renting hotel rooms while in Florida, Mr. Andrews purchased a home, claimed
100 percent business use of the Florida home, and depreciated the house and
furniture as business expenses on his Schedule C for his horse racing and
breeding business. Mr. Andrews then allocated his other travel expenses and
costs of owning and operating this house in Florida on his individual income
tax return as
·
personal
deductions on his Schedule A for a portion of the mortgage interest and taxes,
·
business
deductions on his Schedule C for the horse racing and breeding business, and
·
employee
business expenses on IRS Form 2106 for the pool construction business.
(Tax
reform under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates employee business expense
deductions for tax years 2018 through 2025—so Mr. Andrews would replace his old
strategy with a corporate reimbursement of employee business expenses strategy.)
Just as
Mr. Andrews did, you can tax plan your life to spend your winters in one state
and your summers in a different state. In this scenario, your tax-deductible
home takes the place of your staying in hotels. The other home is likely your
principal residence located near your tax home.
Your
travel expenses between the homes are deductible because you do business in
both places. You also deduct your meals and other living costs while at the
deductible travel destination. You can have separate businesses in each state
or a branch business in the second state.
Tax Reform Destroyed State and Local
Tax Deductions—Fight Back
Tax
reform put the screws to your state and local income tax deductions, capping
them at $10,000. Many states disliked that and have been putting together
workarounds.
But now
the IRS is creating regulations to put the kibosh on your state’s creative
plans. Unless federal lawmakers change their minds, your federal deductions for
state income taxes face that $10,000 ceiling.
But you
have planning opportunities to make more of your property taxes deductible by
·
creating
or enlarging a home office,
·
establishing
or expanding a rental activity inside your home,
·
having
your trade or business activity incur the property taxes, or
·
capitalizing
the property taxes.
If you
are being hurt by the $10,000 ceiling and would like to make more of your
property taxes deductible, you can do some tax planning and make that happen.
Tax Reform Expands Your Section 179
Deduction Privilege
The new and improved
Section 179 deduction gives you more ways to take advantage of immediate tax
deductions. It’s somewhat like having a flexible tax shelter in your back
pocket for when you need it (and also need the property, of course).
As in years past, the
Section 179 deduction is available for both new and used assets and offers you
deduction flexibility, unlike bonus depreciation. Now, thanks to the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act, you have up to $1 million in Section 179 deduction availability.
You also have new Section 179 qualifying asset possibilities such as
·
depreciable
tangible personal property used predominantly to furnish lodging;
·
non-residential
qualified real property; and
·
non-residential
roofs; heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning property; fire protection and
alarm systems; and security systems.
The big advantage to
Section 179 deductions over bonus depreciation is flexibility. But bonus
depreciation has its place as a tax strategy.
Reduce Your Taxes by Making Your
Spouse a Business Partner
Tax reform changed
the rules of the game when choosing your best tax structure. In looking over
the possibilities, a properly structured spousal partnership could be your best
choice.
Here are the tax
benefits to you:
·
Your
spouse’s income is free from self-employment tax.
·
You
and your spouse both still qualify for the new pass-through income deduction
under Section 199A.
·
The
IRS audits partnerships at a much lower rate than proprietorships (Schedule
Cs).
·
You
don’t have to worry about the costs or hassle of running payroll or determining
your reasonable compensation as you would if you operated the business as an S
corporation.
Here are the
potential issues:
·
The
passive activity rules limit your spouse’s use of any losses against regular
income.
·
You
have the cost of preparing a partnership return (but you’d have this cost with
an S corporation too).
If you would like to
discuss how your choice of business entity works in today’s tax environment,
please don’t hesitate to contact us.
Comments
Post a Comment